Appeal No. 1997-0805 Application No. 08/314,189 In view of the above discussion, it is our opinion that, since all of the claim limitations are not present in the disclosure of Kohler, the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection of claims 1-22 can not be sustained. Therefore, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-22 is reversed. REVERSED JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JOSEPH L. DIXON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JFR:hh 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007