Ex parte BARENHOLZ et al. - Page 7




                Appeal No. 1997-1913                                                                                                           
                Application 08/238,149                                                                                                         

                less than the entire claimed subject matter, the examiner? s conclusion is legally unsound                                     

                and cannot stand.  On this record, we reverse the examiner? s rejection of the claims under                                    
                35 U.S.C. ?  103.3                                                                                                             

                         The decision of the examiner is reversed.                                                                             
                                                               REVERSED                                                                        






                                          Sherman D. Winters                        )                                                          
                                          Administrative Patent Judge                       )                                                  
                                                                                            )                                                  
                                                                                            )                                                  
                                                                                            )  BOARD OF PATENT                                 
                                          William F. Smith                                 )                                                  
                                          Administrative Patent Judge                       )     APPEALS AND                                  
                                                                                            )                                                  
                                                                                            )  INTERFERENCES                                   
                                                                                            )                                                  
                                          Toni R. Scheiner                                 )                                                  
                                          Administrative Patent Judge                       )                                                  

                                                                                                                                               
                         3 Because we conclude that the examiner failed to make out a prima facie case of                                      
                obviousness as to claim 23, the sole independent claim, we need not specifically address                                       
                the remaining arguments raised in appellants' Brief and Reply Brief as to separate                                             
                patentability of claim 24.                                                                                                     





                                                                      7                                                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007