Ex parte SPELMAN et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 1997-2245                                                                                     Page 2                        
                 Application No. 08/402,872                                                                                                             


                                                                   BACKGROUND                                                                           
                          Appellant's invention relates to a non-evasive gut                                                                            
                 motility monitor.  An understanding of the invention can be                                                                            
                 derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is                                                                                  
                 reproduced as follows:                                                                                                                 
                          1.  An apparatus for non-invasive monitoring of gut                                                                           
                 motility in a patient, comprising:                                                                                                     
                          a magnet sized to be ingestible by the patient;                                                                               
                          a compass external of the patient directionally sensitive                                                                     
                 to movement of the magnet in the patient’s abdomen for                                                                                 
                 monitoring of gut motility according to movements of the                                                                               
                 ingested magnet.                                                                                                                       
                          The prior art references of record relied upon by the                                                                         
                 examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                                                         
                 Leibing                                               1,971,189                                    Aug. 21,                            
                 1934                                                                                                                                   
                 Golden et al. (Golden)                                5,425,382                                    Jun. 20,                            
                 1995                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                         (filed Sep. 14, 1993)                                          
                 Mishin et al. (Mishin)                                1,174,021                                    Aug. 23,                            
                 1985                                                                                                                                   
                 (Russian Patent)3                                                                                                                      
                 Weitschies, W. et al. (Weitschies), Magnetic Markers as a                                                                              
                 Noninvasive Tool to Monitor Gastrointestinal Transit, IEEE                                                                             


                          3    A translation of this reference, prepared by the United States                                                           
                 Patent and Trademark Office, is appended to the decision on appeal.                                                                    







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007