Ex Parte CARMAN - Page 20



                    Appeal No. 1997-2510                                                                                                    
                    Application No. 07/868,539                                                                                              

                    ordinary skill in the art to do with oligonucleotides with hairpin loops”.  Sakata                                      
                    teach “[s]tudies on the structure and stabilizing factor of the CUUCGGG hairpin                                         
                    RNA.”  See title.  While Sakata teach that “the 2-amino group of guanosine in the                                       
                    loop (9G) stablize the CUUCGG hairpin which is known to have an unusually                                               
                    high Tm” (see Abstract), the examiner fails to identify some reason or suggestion                                       
                    as to why a person of ordinary skill in the art would substitute this CUUCGG                                            
                    sequence into Vickers’ antisense oligonucleotides.                                                                      
                            The examiner fails to explain why a person of ordinary skill in the art                                         
                    would want to modify Vickers to produce a hairpin with an unusually high Tm.                                            
                    The examiner also fails to explain why one of ordinary skill in the art would                                           
                    expect the six nucleotides of Sakata to maintain their unusually high Tm in the                                         
                    context of the construct taught by Vickers.  We remind the examiner, to establish                                       
                    a prima facie case of obviousness, there must be both some suggestion or                                                
                    motivation to modify the references or combine reference teachings and a                                                
                    reasonable expectation of success.  In re Vaeck, 947 F.2d 488, 493, 20 USPQ2d                                           
                    1438, 1442 (Fed. Cir. 1991).                                                                                            
                            The Metzler, Uhlmann and Inouye references fail to make up for the                                              
                    deficiencies in the combination of Vickers and Sakata.  We note, the examiner’s                                         
                    reference to the claims of Inouye.  Inouye does not teach a DNA fragment                                                
                    according to the claimed invention wherein a first region whose sequence                                                






                                                                     20                                                                     



Page:  Previous  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007