Ex Parte ZAROMB - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         

                                                                 Paper No. 30         

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                                Ex parte SOLOMON ZAROMB                               
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1997-3056                                 
                              Application No. 08/377,966                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                HEARD: October 16, 2001                               
                                     ____________                                     
          Before GARRIS, KRATZ and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 1-8.             
          The only other claims in the application, which are claims 9-20,            
          have been allowed by the Examiner.                                          
               The subject matter on appeal relates to an apparatus for               
          monitoring the concentration of an airborne analyte.  This                  
          appealed subject matter is adequately illustrated by independent            
          claim 1 which reads as follows:                                             










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007