Ex parte BJORKLUND et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-3528                                                        
          Application No. 08/230,659                                                  




               Claim 11 is illustrative of the claims on appeal and is                
          reproduced below:                                                           
                    11.  A process for holographic storage in a                       
               photorefractive polymeric optical article comprising                   
               a polymer and a non linear optical chromophore                         
               comprising the steps of (i) exposing the article to                    
               electromagnetic radiation having an intensity of at                    
               least 0.05 W/cm  to obtain an absorbed energy/unit2                                                       
                                        4     3                                       
               volume of at least 1 x 10  J/cm  from said radiation                   
               to activate the article without forming an index                       
               grating and (ii) exposing said article to an                           
               external electric field and electromagnetic                            
               radiation to cause formation of an index grating                       
               provided one of the step (i) or step (ii) exposures                    
               is with two intersecting beams of coherent                             
               electromagnetic radiation and the other step                           
               exposure is a flood exposure.                                          
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a process for                  
          holographic storage in a photorefractive polymeric optical                  
          article comprising the recited steps (i) and (ii).  According               
          to the appellants, “[t]he key feature of the present                        
          invention” is to expose the article to a particular level of                
          electromagnetic radiation without forming an index grating so               
          as “to activate the article and enhance subsequent index                    
          grating formation in the article during the writing process.”               
          (Principal appeal brief, pages 3-4.)                                        


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007