Appeal No. 1997-3528 Application No. 08/230,659 From this description, one skilled in the relevant art would recognize that the applicants invented a process in which the polymeric article is exposed to electromagnetic radiation “prior to forming the index grating.” Additionally, the specification describes the process as comprising the steps of: (i) exposing the article to a certain level of electromagnetic radiation to activate the article and (ii) exposing the article to an external electric field and electromagnetic radiation to form the index grating. (Specification, pages 4-5.) It follows then that the specification adequately describes a process in which step (i) involves exposing the article to a certain level of electromagnetic radiation without the formation of an index grating. We therefore determine that, in compliance with the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112, the specification provides adequate written description for the invention recited in appealed claim 11. B. Rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103: Ducharme in view of Bjorklund 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007