The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JERROLD N. POSLUSNY,
PAUL B. MERKEL,
LAWRENCE G. ANDERSON,
JARED B. MOOBERRY,
and
DAVID H. BOWN
____________
Appeal No. 1997-3701
Application No. 08/141,457
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, LIEBERMAN, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner
refusing to allow claims 2 through 7, 9 through 13, 15, 17 through 22 and claim 25,
1
which are all the claims pending in this application. Claims 1, 8, 14, 16, and 23 have
1An amendment subsequent to the Final Rejection received October 11, 1995, inserted new claim 25.
See the Advisory Action mailed October 25, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007