Appeal No. 1998-0210
Application No. 08/149,193
1. Claims 119 and 132 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
112, first paragraph as being based upon a specification which
does not descriptively support the claimed invention.
2. Claims 113 through 138 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite.
3. Claim 134 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
being anticipated by Jordan, Jr.
4. Claims 113 through 119, 121, 123 through 130, and 132
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Jordan, Jr.
5. Claims 120, 133, and 135 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Jordan, Jr. in view
of Zaleski.
3(...continued)
the present case. Since paragraph 4. does not set forth a
rejection of claims 128 and 129 for our review under 35 U.S.C.
§ 134, no further comment thereon is necessary.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007