Appeal No. 1998-0210 Application No. 08/149,193 capable of distributing a considerable proportion of a golfer’s weight in conjunction with weight distribution by portions of the lower surface of the flange exposed between the ribs. In light of our differing perspective of the underlying teaching of appellants’ disclosure, as above, we make note of appellants’ objective (main brief, page 6) of pursuing “broader coverage” in the present application commensurate with the “true scope” of the invention, as compared to the narrow coverage obtained for a swirl embodiment (U. S. Patent Nos. 5,259,129 and 5,367,793). The first rejection We affirm the rejection of claims 119 and 132 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph. The examiner is of the view (answer, page 4) that the specification, as originally filed, does not provide descriptive support for the recitation that traction ribs 10Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007