Ex parte DEACON et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 1998-0210                                                        
          Application No. 08/149,193                                                  


          capable of distributing a considerable proportion of a                      
          golfer’s weight in conjunction with                                         
          weight distribution by portions of the lower surface of the                 
          flange exposed between the ribs.                                            


               In light of our differing perspective of the underlying                
          teaching of appellants’ disclosure, as above, we make note of               
          appellants’ objective (main brief, page 6) of pursuing                      
          “broader coverage” in the present application commensurate                  
          with the “true scope” of the invention, as compared to the                  
          narrow coverage obtained for a swirl embodiment (U. S. Patent               
          Nos. 5,259,129 and 5,367,793).                                              


                                 The first rejection                                  


               We affirm the rejection of claims 119 and 132 under                    
          35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.                                           


               The examiner is of the view (answer, page 4) that the                  
          specification, as originally filed, does not provide                        
          descriptive support for the recitation that traction ribs                   
                                         10                                           





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007