Appeal No. 1998-0908 Application No. 08/506,292 1440, 1444, 221 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir.); cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1228 (1984); W.L. Gore & Assocs. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 1554, 220 USPQ 303, 313 (Fed. Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 851 (1984). With respect to the reliance on King '241 as the basis for the 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) rejection, the Examiner attempts (Answer, page 5) to read the various limitations of the appealed claims on the disclosure of King '241. In the Examiner’s view, the testing arrangement of King '241, which includes product wafer 12, compliant interconnect 13, 16, and test wafer 20, meets all of the fundamental limitations of the claims on appeal. Similarly, with respect to King '405, the Examiner makes particular reference to the description beginning at column 5, line 65 of the embodiment illustrated in Figures 8-11. According to the Examiner, this embodiment of King '405 discloses opposing product and test wafers mounted across an elastomer interconnect as claimed by Appellants. After reviewing the King '241 and King '405 references,Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007