Appeal No. 1998-1119
Application No. 08/482,924
combined, the combined teachings of the references would still
require the storage of more than one other bit (e.g.,
parity/marking) with the data word. In short, the examiner
has failed to present a prima facie case of obviousness.
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 63 and 77
through 81 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007