2
Gladrow (Gladrow ‘309) 4,283,309 Aug. 11, 1981
THE REJECTIONS
Claims 11 through 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by or,
1 2
in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Gladrow ‘818. ,
Claim 19 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by or, in the
alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Gladrow ‘309.
Claims 11 through 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable
over Gladrow ‘309 combined with Gladrow ‘818.
OPINION
The Rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103
We have carefully considered all of the arguments advanced by the appellant
and the examiner and agree with the appellant that the rejections of claims 11
through 18 under section 102(b) as anticipated by Gladrow ‘818 and the rejection
of claim 19 over Gladrow ‘309 under section 103(a) are not well founded.
Accordingly, we reverse these rejections. We agree with the examiner that the
rejections of claims 11 through 18 under section 103(a) as being unpatentable over
Gladrow ‘818 is well founded. Accordingly, we affirm this rejection.
1
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007