Ex parte BARBER et al. - Page 6




                     Appeal No. 1998-1181                                                                                                                                              
                     Application No. 08/442,883                                                                                                                                        

                     Clark Corp., 713 F.2d 760, 772, 218 USPQ 781, 789 (Fed. Cir.                                                                                                      
                     1983).                                                                                                                                                            
                                Appellants argue  that Blair does not disclose the claimed6                                                                                                                    
                     step of "defining a plurality of home system identification                                                                                                       
                     codes (SIDs)" or "automatically selecting the cellular carrier                                                                                                    
                     corresponding to the detected SID matching any home SID of the                                                                                                    
                     plurality of home SIDs".                                                                                                                                          
                                In reply to the Examiner's assertion that the abstract of                                                                                              
                     Blair discloses the use of plural home SIDs, Appellants argue                                                                                                     
                     that the intended meaning of the abstract is that the cellular                                                                                                    
                     telephone checks the carrier signal's SID against only one                                                                                                        
                     home SID entered into the cellular telephone unit's memory.                                                                                                       
                     Appellants point to column 5, lines 8-13 of the specification                                                                                                     
                     of Blair, which references figures 4 and 5, as directed to                                                                                                        
                     locking onto a frequency of “the” home system (Appellants'                                                                                                        
                     emphasis).                                                                                                                                                        
                                Appellants also disagree with the Examiner's statement7                                                                                                
                     that "a home SID and one or more good SIDs are considered as a                                                                                                    
                     plurality of home SIDs since these SIDs have been stored in                                                                                                       

                                6 Brief, Section I, page 12.                                                                                                                           
                                7In the Advisory Action.                                                                                                                               
                                                                                          6                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007