Ex parte BARBER et al. - Page 11




          Appeal No. 1998-1181                                                        
          Application No. 08/442,883                                                  

          corresponding structure or steps, or equivalents, to the                    
          claimed invention.                                                          
               We also agree with Appellant that a home SID and one or                
          more good SIDs are not the same as a plurality of home SIDs,                
          even if these SIDs have been stored in the memory of a                      
          portable telephone by a service technician.  Blair, by the                  
          distinct nomenclature given the different SIDs, recognizes the              
          distinction between home SIDs and other classes of SIDs.  See,              
          for example, the discussion of good SIDs and negative SIDs at               
          column 4, lines 38-43, of Blair, and the recitation of home                 
          SIDs at column 4, line 54, and figures 3 and 5, of Blair.                   
               Accordingly, we reverse the rejection of claims 46-48 and              
          55-56 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Blair.                     









          B.  Rejection of claims 55-56 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                   
          anticipated by Krolopp                                                      



                                         11                                           





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007