Appeal No. 1998-1181 Application No. 08/442,883 Appellants argue that Krolopp does not teach an10 automatically selecting method or apparatus as Krolopp provides that the user is prompted if the received system11 identification code matches an identification code stored in the radiotelephone's memory. Appellants further note Krollop's statement “In the preferred embodiment, the user12 punches a button in the radiotelephone's keypad to make the selection.” (Appellants' emphasis). Appellants also assert that Krollop's use of the word "selecting" refers to the 13 action of actually designating a particular system for use. Appellants also argue that the Examiner erred in stating14 that claims 55-56 lack the limitation of "means for automatically selecting a carrier frequency as a home carrier" (Examiner's emphasis). Appellants rely on the earlier recitation of the word "selecting" in the preamble of claim 55 10Brief, Section K, page 15. 11 Figure 2, box 104; column 2, lines 64-66. 12Column 3, lines 10-15. 13 Column 3, lines 10-20. 14Brief, page 16. 12Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007