Ex parte GUNNINK et al. - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           
                                                                 Paper No. 22         
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
             Ex parte BRETT GUNNINK, JAYANTH KANUNAR and ZHUOXIONG LIANG              
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1998-1217                                  
                            Application No. 08/405,599                                
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before GARRIS, PAK, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative                    
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection               
          of claims 1-23 which are all of the claims remaining in the                 
          application.                                                                
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a process                      
          for making compacts from coal particles and to a coal compact               
          comprising compacted coal particles.  This appealed subject                 
          matter is adequately illustrated by independent claim 1 which               
          reads as follows:                                                           







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007