Ex parte GUNNINK et al. - Page 7




                 Appeal No. 1998-1217                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/405,599                                                                                                             


                 their claimed product.  Under these circumstances, we will                                                                             
                 sustain the Examiner's 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims 21-23                                                                       
                 as being unpatentable over Dick in view of Beckmann.2                                                                                  




























                          2It is appropriate to emphasize that the Appellants have                                                                      
                 grouped claims 21-23 together on this appeal; see page 14 of                                                                           
                 the brief.                                                                                                                             
                                                                           7                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007