The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 36 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ROGER W. PHILLIPS, LAUREN R. WENDT, MYRA TAN-JOHNSON, DAVID W. TODD and CHARLES T. MARKANTES ____________ Appeal No. 1998-1416 Application No. 08/062,736 ____________ HEARD: August 16, 2001 ____________ Before, LIEBERMAN, KRATZ, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to allow claims 18-22, 25 and 27. Claims 23, 24, 26 and 28 have been indicated as allowable by the examiner (answer, page 4). Claims 1-17 and 29-42, which are all of the other claims pendingPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007