Appeal No. 1998-1416 Page 8 Application No. 08/062,736 the claimed subject matter obvious within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103 prior to final disposition of this application. CONCLUSION The decision of the examiner to reject claims 18, 19 and 25 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Jones is affirmed. The decision of the examiner to reject claims 20-22 and 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Jones is reversed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED-IN-PART PAUL LIEBERMAN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT PETER F. KRATZ ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007