Ex parte KARN et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-1664                                                        
          Application No. 08/323,982                                                  


                    23.  The overbased metal salt of claim 1 wherein                  
               the metal ratio is at least about 1.5.                                 
                    28.  A lubricant comprising:                                      
                    (a) an oil of lubricating viscosity, and                          
                    (b) an overbased metal salt of an acidic                          
               material selected from the group consisting of                         
                    (i) hydrocarbyl-substituted carboxyalkylene-                      
               linked phenols,                                                        
                    (ii) dihydrocarbyl esters of alkylene                             
               dicarboxylic acids, the alkylene group being                           
               substituted with a hydroxy group and an additional                     
               carboxylic acid group, and                                             
                    (iii) alkylene-linked polyaromatic molecules,                     
               the aromatic moieties whereof comprise at least one                    
               hydrocarbyl-substituted phenol and at least one                        
               carboxy phenol;                                                        
                    the hydrocarbyl group or groups of said acidic                    
               material being of sufficient length to provide oil                     
               solubility to the salt;                                                
                    wherein the overbased metal salt has a metal                      
               ratio of at least 1.3.                                                 
               As evidence of unpatentability, the examiner relies upon               
          the following prior art references:                                         
          Adams et al. (Adams)          5,281,346                Jan. 25,             
          1994                                                                        
                                             (filing date Apr. 16,                    
          1992)                                                                       
          Blystone et al. (Blystone)    5,356,546                Oct. 18,             
          1994                                                                        
                                             (filing date Apr. 16,                    
          1992)                                                                       
               The following grounds of rejection are presented for our               
          review in this appeal:                                                      

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007