The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte DAVID L. COLE _____________ Appeal No. 1998-1672 Application No. 08/708,163 _____________ HEARD: May 10, 2001 _____________ Before KRATZ, DELMENDO, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges. PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to allow claims 8-20, 25, 26, and 27. Appellant states that all of the claims are grouped together for consideration in this appeal. (Brief, page 6). The examiner states that “[s]ince appellants fail to separately provide an argument for each of the claims, the group of the appealed claims stands of falls with thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007