Ex parte CHRISTNER et al. - Page 2




                   Appeal No. 1998-1720                                                                                                                             
                   Application No. 08/384,239                                                                                                                       
                            This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims                                                   
                   2 and 5 through 11, all the claims remaining in the application.                                                                                 
                            Claims 9, 10 and 11 are representative and read as follows:                                                                             
                            9.  A powdered or granulated enzyme preparation, free of surface active agents,                                                         
                   consisting of 80 to 99.9 percent by weight of at least one salt, otherwise conventionally                                                        
                   used as a diluent, the remainder being a protease, present in the preparation in inactive                                                        
                   form in a tannin complex from which it is released in active form by the salt when the                                                           
                   preparation is dissolved in water.                                                                                                               
                            10.  In a method of soaking hides in a soaking float in the presence of a proteolytic                                                   
                   enzyme, the improvement wherein the enzyme is added to the soaking float as the enzyme                                                           
                   preparation of Claim 9 to give a proteolytic activity from 10000 to 30000 Löhlein-Volhard                                                        
                   units per liter of soaking float.                                                                                                                
                            11.  In a method of bating hides in bate liquor in the presence of a proteolytic                                                        
                   enzyme, the improvement wherein the enzyme is added to the bate liquor as the enzyme                                                             
                   preparation of claim 9 to give a proteolytic activity from 5000 to 20000 Löhlein-Volhard                                                         
                   units per liter of bate liquor.                                                                                                                  
                            The references relied on by the examiner are as follows:                                                                                
                   Green et al. (Green)                            4,009,076                              Feb. 22, 1977                                             
                   Borello                                                   4,087,368                             May 2, 1978                                      
                   Tang et al. (Tang)                                        4,266,031                             May 5, 1981                                      
                   German Patent Spec. (Thomas)                              0,128,419                             Feb. 7, 1902                                     
                   German Patent Spec. (Grimm I)                             0,975,095                             Jul. 20, 1956                                    
                   German Patent Spec. (Grimm II)                            0,974,813                             Apr. 13, 1961                                    
                   German Patent Spec. (Grimm III) 0,976,107                                              Feb. 7, 1963                                              
                   British Patent Spec. (Töpfer)                             1,156,900                             Jul. 2, 1969                                     
                   German Patent Spec. (Geyer)                               2,143,945                             Mar. 8, 19731                                    

                            1According to appellants, “[t]he German patents discussed hereinafter were                                                              
                   brought to the Examiner’s attention by the appellants in the Information Disclosure                                                              
                   Statement filed January 6, 1992 in a prior application 07/783,901, now abandoned,” which                                                         
                   “Statement contains translations of the relevant content of these patents.” Brief, page 3.  It                                                   
                                                                                                                              (continued...)                        
                                                                                 2                                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007