Ex parte DAUKSHER et al. - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written  
                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           

                                                                    Paper No. 11         

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                       ____________                                      
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                            
                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                       ____________                                      
                  Ex parte WILLIAM J. DAUKSHER and DOUGLAS J. RESNICK                    
                                       ____________                                      
                                   Appeal No. 1998-2329                                  
                               Application No. 08/740,402                                
                                       ____________                                      
                                         ON BRIEF                                        
                                       ____________                                      
          Before PAK, OWENS, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                    
          WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                            


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                              
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from                
          the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 9 and 19.                   
          Claims 10 through 18 are the only other claims pending in this                 
          application but remain withdrawn from consideration by the                     
          examiner as being directed to a non-elected invention (Final                   
          Rejection dated Sep. 3, 1997, Paper No. 4, page 2).                            
               According to appellants, the invention is directed to a                   
          method of forming a low stress, hard mask for use in refractory                






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007