The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 11 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WILLIAM J. DAUKSHER and DOUGLAS J. RESNICK ____________ Appeal No. 1998-2329 Application No. 08/740,402 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before PAK, OWENS, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 9 and 19. Claims 10 through 18 are the only other claims pending in this application but remain withdrawn from consideration by the examiner as being directed to a non-elected invention (Final Rejection dated Sep. 3, 1997, Paper No. 4, page 2). According to appellants, the invention is directed to a method of forming a low stress, hard mask for use in refractoryPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007