Appeal No. 1998-2649
Application No. 08/616,990
The deficiencies described above are not supplied by the
additionally applied reference to Mosely. Accordingly, we
cannot sustain either the Section 103 rejection of claims 1-11
and 13-28 over Canon in view of Barnes or the corresponding
rejection of claims 12 and 29 over these references and
further in view of Mosely.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
EDWARD C. KIMLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
BEVERLY A. PAWLIKOWSKI )
Administrative Patent Judge )
BRG:hh
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007