Ex parte COLEMAN - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-2683                                                        
          Application 08/579,386                                                      


          or process black.  The invention makes a pixel by pixel                     
          determination based on a background color assigned for each                 
          pixel.                                                                      
          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
          1.  In a system which uses electronic signals to                            
          specify black and non black colorants to be used in a printing              
          process to print a black area over a background area, a method              
          for determining colorants to be used to print said black area               
          comprising the steps of:                                                    
               testing said signals to determine if the background is                 
          to be printed using a non black colorant,                                   
               if a non black colorant is to be used to print the                     
          background, generate a signal specifying that said black color              
          will be printed using a first black color,                                  
               if no non black colorants are used to print the                        
          background, generate a signal specifying that said black color              
          will be printed using a second black color, and                             
               printing said black area.                                              
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Nickell et al. (Nickell)      5,113,356          May  12, 1992              
          Vaughn et al. (Vaughn)        5,475,800          Dec. 12, 1995              
          The admitted prior art described in appellant’s specification.              
          Claims 1-19, 32 and 33 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                       
          § 103.  As evidence of obviousness the examiner offers the                  
          admitted prior art in view of Vaughn with respect to claims 1-              
          7, 32 and 33, and the examiner adds Nickell with respect to                 
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007