Appeal No. 1998-2683
Application 08/579,386
examiner relies on the admitted prior art and Vaughn as
discussed above. Nickell is additionally cited for its
teachings of the use of a page description language (PDL).
Since the collective teachings of the admitted prior art are
deficient as discussed above, and since Nickell does not
overcome these deficiencies, we also do not sustain the
rejection of claims 8-19 based on the admitted prior art,
Vaughn and Nickell.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007