Appeal No. 1998-2947
Application No. 08/682,876
arguments are not persuasive and do not overcome the prima facie case of
anticipation established by the examiner.
The examiner's rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. ' 102(b) is sustained.
With regard to claim 2, the examiner relies on the teaching of Jacobsen, at
column 5, to provide for the suggestion of a push-pull movement provided by
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007