THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for publication
in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte VICTOR M. DACOSTA, and ALAN G. LEWIS
__________________
Appeal No. 1998-3044
Application 08/458,5391
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before SCHAFER, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and LEE
and MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s rejection of appellants’ claims 1-12. No claim
has been allowed. The real party in interest is Xerox
Corporation.
References relied on by the Examiner
Hatada et al. (Hatada) 4,766,426 Aug. 23, 1988
Duwaer 4,922,240 May 01, 1990
Fukuda 5,162,786 Nov. 10, 1992
Ishimaru 5,532,718 July 02, 1996
1
Application for patent filed June 02, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007