Ex parte SCHWARZ - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                 
                                                            Paper No. 15              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                  ________________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                  ________________                                    
                             Ex parte WILLIAM M. SCHWARZ                              
                                  ________________                                    
                                Appeal No. 1998-3281                                  
                               Application 08/650,5001                                
                                  ________________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                  ________________                                    
          Before METZ, WARREN and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                 
          METZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's            
          refusal to allow claims 3 through 15, 17 through 20 and 22.                 
          Claims 16 and 21, the only other pending claims in this                     
          application, were indicated as allowable by the examiner in his             
          advisory action mailed on June 4, 1998 (Paper Number 9).                    















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007