Ex parte CHANG - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-3383                                                        
          Application 08/352,662                                                      


               means, responsive to locating an undefined process                     
          variable field in the process control block corresponding to                
          the first process, for defining a User Defined Process                      
          Variable in the undefined process variable field; and                       
               means for assigning a value to a User Defined Process                  
          Variable in the control block corresponding to the first                    
          process.                                                                    
               The Examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Bristol             5,247,693                Sept. 21, 1993                 
          Stevens, "Advanced Programming in the UNIX Environment",                    
          pp. 85-90, 130, 172, 173, 188, 189, 190, 192, 210, 238-240,                 
          (1992).                                                                     
               Claims 1-10, 12-21 and 23-28 stand rejected under 35                   
          U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Stevens in view of                  
          Bristol.                                                                    
               Rather than reiterate arguments of Appellant and                       
          Examiner, reference is made to the brief and answer for the                 
          respective details thereof.                                                 
                                       OPINION                                        
               We will not sustain the rejection of claims 1-10, 12-21                
          and 23-28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                            
               The Examiner has failed to set forth a prima facie case.               
          It is the burden of the Examiner to establish why one having                
          ordinary skill in the art would have been led to the claimed                
          invention by the express teachings or suggestions found in the              
                                         -3-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007