Ex Parte ALBRECHTA et al - Page 1




        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not            
        written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.            
                                                               Paper No. 16           

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     __________                                       
                 Ex parte STANLEY M. ALBRECHTA, CHRISTINA M. BOYKO,                   
                    KATHLEEN L. COVERT, NATALIE B. FEILCHENFELD,                      
                        VOYA R. MARKOVICH, WILLIAM E. WILSON,                         
                                         and                                          
                                   MICHAEL WOZNIAK                                    
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1998-3401                                  
                             Application No. 08/495,277                               
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      

          Before GARRIS, PAK, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.             
          DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from             
          the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1 through 9, which are all           
          of the claims pending in the subject application.1                          
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a method for                   
          producing a circuit board.  Further details of this appealed                
          subject matter are recited in illustrative claim 1 reproduced               
                                                                                     
               1  In response to the final Office action of July 16, 1997             
          (paper 8), the appellants filed an amendment under 37 CFR § 1.116           
          (1981) on September 15, 1997 (paper 9), proposing changes to                
          claims 1 and 9.  The examiner indicated in the advisory action of           







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007