The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte STANLEY M. ALBRECHTA, CHRISTINA M. BOYKO, KATHLEEN L. COVERT, NATALIE B. FEILCHENFELD, VOYA R. MARKOVICH, WILLIAM E. WILSON, and MICHAEL WOZNIAK __________ Appeal No. 1998-3401 Application No. 08/495,277 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before GARRIS, PAK, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges. DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1 through 9, which are all of the claims pending in the subject application.1 The subject matter on appeal relates to a method for producing a circuit board. Further details of this appealed subject matter are recited in illustrative claim 1 reproduced 1 In response to the final Office action of July 16, 1997 (paper 8), the appellants filed an amendment under 37 CFR § 1.116 (1981) on September 15, 1997 (paper 9), proposing changes to claims 1 and 9. The examiner indicated in the advisory action ofPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007