Appeal No. 1999-0085
Application No. 08/427,514
interface according to the local database; and
operating the radio system console operator
interface to perform operational control of a
portion of the radio communication system
through the radio system control module.
The examiner relies on the following reference:
Connor et al. (Connor) 5,341,498 Aug. 23, 1994
Claims 1, 4, 5, 7, 9-11, 13 and 14 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by the
disclosure of Connor. Claims 6 and 12 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of
Connor taken alone.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejections advanced by the examiner and the
evidence of anticipation and obviousness relied upon by the
examiner as support for the rejections. We have, likewise,
reviewed and taken into consideration, in reaching our
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007