Appeal No. 1999-0085 Application No. 08/427,514 Gore and Associates, Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 1554, 220 USPQ 303, 313 (Fed. Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 851 (1984). The examiner has indicated how he purports to find anticipation of the claimed invention [answer, pages 3-4]. With respect to independent claims 1 and 7, appellants argue that Connor does not teach the storage of a radio system personality profile in both the local database and in a radio system control module, and maintaining consistency between the radio system control module and the local database through version information. Specifically, appellants argue that the examiner has failed to show version information being used to maintain consistency between information stored by Connor’s console interface and a local database that is maintained as claimed [brief, page 4]. With respect to independent claims 4 and 9, appellants argue that Connor does not teach the use of a validate configuration request as claimed [id.]. Finally, with respect to dependent claim 5, appellants argue that Connor does not teach soliciting operator permission before 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007