Appeal No. 1999-0085
Application No. 08/427,514
35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the teachings of Connor
taken alone. Claims 6 and 12 respectively depend from claims
4 and 9. Since the examiner’s rejection of claims 6 and 12
does not address the deficiencies of Connor noted above, we do
not sustain the examiner’s rejection of these claims.
In summary, we have not sustained either of the
examiner’s rejections of the appealed claims. Therefore, the
decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1, 4-7 and 9-14 is
reversed.
REVERSED
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
js/vsh
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007