Appeal No. 1999-0134
Application 08/590,695
The following rejections are separately set forth in
the examiner’s answer:
1. Claims 1-7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Aihara in view of
Mannle.
2. Claim 5 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Aihara in view of
Mannle and further in view of Millman.
3. Claims 8-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Aihara in view of
Mannle and further in view of Fukui.
4. Claim 14 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Aihara in view of
Fukui and further in view of Millman.
5. Claim 15 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Aihara in view of
Mannle.
6. Claims 16-29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over the teachings of Aihara in view of
Mannle.
-3-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007