Ex parte PARULKAR et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 1999-0134                                                       
          Application 08/590,695                                                     


          findings that each of the recitations argued in sections IV-IX             
          of the brief is taught or suggested by the applied prior art.              












          In summary, since we are essentially in agreement with                     
          each of appellants’ arguments set forth in the brief, we find              
          that the examiner has failed to establish a prima facie case               
          of obviousness.  Therefore, the decision of the examiner                   
          rejecting claims 1-29 is reversed.                                         
          REVERSED                                                                   





                         JERRY SMITH                   )                             
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                             
                                                      )                             
                                                      )                             
                                                      )                             
                         LEE E. BARRETT                     )  BOARD OF              
                                         -9-                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007