Appeal No. 1999-0134 Application 08/590,695 findings that each of the recitations argued in sections IV-IX of the brief is taught or suggested by the applied prior art. In summary, since we are essentially in agreement with each of appellants’ arguments set forth in the brief, we find that the examiner has failed to establish a prima facie case of obviousness. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-29 is reversed. REVERSED JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) LEE E. BARRETT ) BOARD OF -9-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007