Appeal No. 1999-0264 Application No. 08/573,582 efficient writing of information on a "rotating type recording medium" such as a hard disk, the Examiner has not provided evidence that would have suggested to the person having ordinary skill in the art the desirability of modifying Nakajima's tape drive system to include the microprocessor taught by Kobayashi within the drive. Kobayashi does not teach a system that fully inhibits writing to a given sector of the drive: Kobayashi teaches that "when information having been recorded in the initially specified block is determined to be useless, the high-ranking apparatus can again issue a write instruction in such a manner that the high-ranking apparatus specifies the initially specified block once more but now specifying the update write mode" (column 9, lines 1- 7). The microprocessor of Kobayashi thus does not inhibit writing, but acts only to require the "proper" mode from the higher rank device before permitting writing to the desired sector. Director and Purvis are relied upon for indicating when a protected device is selected, and for a device monitoring errors from a microprocessor, respectively, and do not supply the motivation missing from Nakajima, Saldanha, and Kobayashi, 13Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007