Ex parte PALM et al. - Page 13




          Appeal No. 1999-0296                                      Page 13           
          Application No. 08/483,552                                                  


          adjusting focal length of the zoom lenses to hold a location                
          of the neutral plane substantially constant[;]” or “adjusting               
          the effective distance between the optical axes of the                      
          objective lenses to hold a location of the neutral plane                    
          substantially constant when the distance of the objective                   
          lenses to the scene changes.”  Therefore, we reverse the                    
          rejection of claims 3, 7, 12, and 15 as being obvious over                  
          Robinson in view of Anderson; claim 8 as being anticipated by               
          Robinson; and claim 16 as being obvious over Robinson.  We                  
          proceed to claims 4 and 13.                                                 


                                III. Claims 4 and 13                                  
               The examiner asserts that Robinson discloses “means for                
          adjusting the distance between said optical axes (or camera                 
          separation, which is "a way" of controlling disparity while                 
          adjusting focal length of the zoom lenses, to hold a location               
          of the neutral plane substantially constant.”  (Examiner’s                  
          Answer at 6.)  The appellants argue, “Robinson does not teach               
          or suggest linking zoom and disparity.”  (Reply Br. at 7.)                  










Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007