Ex parte MINAMI - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-0297                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/502,253                                                  





               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          DeLuca et al. (DeLuca)         5,089,813          Feb. 18,                  
          1992                                                                        
          Kane et al. (Kane)             5,315,635          May  24,                  
          1994                                                                        


               Claims 1-27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being              
          unpatentable over DeLuca in view of Kane.                                   
               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced              
          by the examiner and appellant regarding the above-noted                     
          rejection, we make reference to the examiner’s answer (Paper                
          No. 15, mailed July 17, 1998) for the examiner’s complete                   
          reasoning in support of the rejection, and to appellant’s                   
          brief (Paper No. 14, filed June 23, 1998) and reply brief                   
          (Paper No. 17, filed September 17, 1998) for appellant’s                    
          arguments thereagainst.                                                     


                                       OPINION                                        









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007