The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of
the Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte WILLIAM J. GRANDE, WILLIAM MEY,
THOMAS M. STEPHANY and THOMAS N. TOMBS
__________
Appeal No. 1999-0427
Application 08/782,272
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before JERRY SMITH, RUGGIERO and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-37, which constitute
all the claims in the application. An amendment after final
rejection was filed on February 17, 1998 but was denied entry
by the examiner.
The disclosed invention pertains to an electrographic
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007