The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board Paper No. 36 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte RUSSELL W. HECKMAN, JAMES A. HERMAN, LARRY P. SHIPLE and WALTER E. TRAXLER _____________ Appeal No. 1999-0509 Application No. 08/693,585 _____________ ON BRIEF _____________ Before MCCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, ABRAMS and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. MCCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner=s final rejection of claims 22, 23 and 25 through 35. The only other claims still pending in the application have been withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-elected invention. The invention disclosed in appellants= application relates to the attachment of a heat-shrinkable label to an article such as a glass or plastic container. Claims 22, 23 and 25-31 are directed to a method of applying a label to a container, claims 32-34 are directed to the product produced by any one of the foregoing method claims and claim 35 is directed to a method of applying segments of heat shrinkable material to an article.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007