Ex parte HECKMAN et al. - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                             
                                      publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                                         
                                                                                                Paper No. 36                      
                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                         
                                                          ____________                                                              
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                               
                                                         _____________                                                              
                                  Ex parte RUSSELL W. HECKMAN, JAMES A. HERMAN,                                                     
                                        LARRY P. SHIPLE and WALTER E. TRAXLER                                                       
                                                         _____________                                                              
                                                      Appeal No. 1999-0509                                                          
                                                   Application No. 08/693,585                                                       
                                                         _____________                                                              
                                                            ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                         _____________                                                              
                   Before MCCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, ABRAMS and                                                
                   NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                   
                   MCCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                  

                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                              
                           This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner=s final rejection of claims 22,                        
                   23 and 25 through 35.  The only other claims still pending in the application have been                          
                   withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-elected invention.                                       
                           The invention disclosed in appellants= application relates to the attachment of a                        
                   heat-shrinkable label to an article such as a glass or plastic container.  Claims 22, 23 and                     
                   25-31 are directed to a method of applying a label to a container, claims 32-34 are                              
                   directed to the product produced by any one of the foregoing method claims and claim 35                          
                   is directed to a method of applying segments of heat shrinkable material to an article.                          






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007