Ex parte SCHNEBLY et al. - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                               Paper No. 19           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    ____________                                      

                    Ex parte JOHN T. SCHNEBLY, KEVIN C. MARTIN,                       
                             RANDY KOLEDA and LEO LITTO                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1999-0574                                  
                             Application No. 08/583,588                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and LEVY, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                 
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-38.  Added claim 39               
          stands withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a                  
          different invention from the invention already examined.  An                
          amendment after final rejection was filed on April 27, 1998                 
          but was denied entry by the examiner.                                       








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007