Ex parte SCHNEBLY et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-0574                                                        
          Application No. 08/583,588                                                  


          The disclosed invention pertains to a window covering                       
          and lighting system for a window which are independently                    
          controllable.                                                               
          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               1.  A window covering and lighting system for a window in              
          a room comprising:                                                          
               a cornice mounted to a wall supporting a window covering               
          movable between an open position and a closed position,                     
               an actuator operatively associated with the cornice for                
          moving the window covering between the open position and the                
          closed position,                                                            
               a lighting system operatively associated with the                      
          cornice; and                                                                
               a programmable logic control unit for operating the                    
          actuator and the lighting system independently from one                     
          another upon demand.                                                        

          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Clemmons et al. (Clemmons)    4,544,866          Oct. 01, 1985              
          Zerillo                       4,958,112          Sep. 18, 1990              
          Lin                           5,247,232          Sep. 21, 1993              
          The admitted prior art set forth in appellants’ specification.              
          Claims 1-6, 8, 10-15 and 20-23 stand rejected under                         
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of                 
          Zerillo and the admitted prior art.  Claims 7, 9 and 16-19                  
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                  
          over the teachings of Zerillo and the admitted prior art in                 
          view of Lin.  Claims 24-38  stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007