Appeal No. 1999-0862
Application 08/764,275
for the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We will not sustain the rejection of claims 1 through 16
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.
The Examiner argues that Appellants’ disclosure fails to
teach how to place an exact number of donors atoms in precise
locations. More specifically, the Examiner argues that
appellants’ disclosure fails to provide an enabling disclosure
of how to align singular atoms in a two-dimensional plane with
individually closely packed spaces located under the
intervening layers.
On page 5 of the brief, Appellants argue that they have
clearly established on the record that one of ordinary skill
in the art would know how to make and/or use the invention
given the originally filed disclosure, and that thus the
original disclosure is enabling. Appellants point to the
by the Examiner is deemed necessary.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007