Ex parte DOYLE et al. - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication                 
                                      and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                         

                                                                                     Paper No. 27                        
                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                   _____________                                                         
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                   _____________                                                         
                        Ex parte  DENIS DOYLE, KIERAN NUNAN and  MICHAEL O'NEILL                                         
                                                   _____________                                                         
                                                Appeal No. 1999-0886                                                     
                                              Application No. 08/722,738                                                 
                                                   ______________                                                        
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                  _______________                                                        
              Before KRASS, BARRETT and HECKER,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
              KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        

                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                     This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-6, all of the pending             
              claims.  Claims 7-9 were withdrawn as being directed to a nonelected invention.                            
                     The invention pertains to an electronic programmable read only memory (EPROM).                      
              An EPROM requires “hot” electrons, or “hot carrier” generation in the                                      




              channel region in order to program the EPROM.  However, in the prior art, incorporation of                 

                                                           1                                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007