The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte THOMAS D. SYKES ____________ Appeal No. 1999-1045 Application No. 08/651,759 ____________ ON BRIEF1 ____________ Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges. COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 3, 10, 20, and 40 through 55, all of the claims remaining in the application. Entry of an after final amendment to claim 1 (Paper No. 11) was approved by the examiner (Paper No. 12). On page 2 of the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 18), the examiner indicated that the rejections of claims 3, 10, 42, 43, 45, 47 through 51, 53, and 55 have been withdrawn, with claims 10 and 47 through 49 1 An oral hearing set for December 7, 1999 was waived by appellant (Paper No. 24).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007