Appeal No. 1999-1045 Application No. 08/651,759 now being allowed and claims 3, 42, 43, 45, 50, 51, 53, and 55 now being objected to as dependent upon a rejected base claim but allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Appellant’s invention pertains to a platform for a hand- controllable data input device used with a microprocessor and an operator’s extremity associated with controlling the data input device, and to a platform for a hand-operated pointing device used with a microprocessor and an operator’s appendage associated with controlling the pointing device. A basic understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 1 and 44, copies of which appear in the APPENDIX to the brief (Paper No. 17). As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the documents listed below:2 2 The examiner has listed five references on pages 3 and 4 of the answer (Paper No. 18), however, we have only included herein those documents applied by the examiner in the rejections now before us. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007