Ex parte BLANEY et al. - Page 6




                   Appeal No. 1999-1081                                                                                               Page 6                        
                   Application No. 08/458,983                                                                                                                       


                   out above with regard to the Section 102(b) rejection is not overcome, inasmuch as the                                                           
                   record provides no reasons why one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated                                                        
                   to apply the teachings of the references regarding building panel elements to building                                                           
                   blocks, other than the hindsight afforded one who first viewed the appellants’ disclosure.                                                       
                            The rejections of claims 15, 18 and 71 under Section 103 are not sustained.                                                             


























                            2(...continued)                                                                                                                         
                   suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art.  See, for example, In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413,                                                    
                   425, 208 USPQ 871, 881 (CCPA 1981).                                                                                                              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007