Appeal No. 1999-1271 Application No. 08/467,883 The examiner relies on the following references: Kuo et al. (Kuo) 5,192,540 Mar. 9, 1993 Munson et al. (Munson), “Purification and Partial Characterization of Outer Membrane Proteins P5 and P6 from Haemophilus influenzae Type b,” Infection and Immunity, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 544-549 (1985) Loeb, “Protection of Infant Rats from Haemophilus influenzae Type b Infection by Antiserum to Purified Outer Membrane Protein a,” Infection and Immunity, Vol. 55, No. 11, pp. 2612-2618 (1987) Claims 29-46 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over the combined disclosures of Kuo, Loeb, and Munson. We reverse. Discussion Appellants’ specification discloses a method of isolating three outer membrane proteins, known as P1, P2, and P6, from a single preparation of Haemophilus influenzae cells. See pages 13-17. The claims on appeal are directed to this method. The examiner rejected the claims as obvious over Kuo, Loeb, and Munson. Kuo discloses a method of isolating H. influenzae outer membrane protein P2. See column 2, lines 32-35. In Kuo’s method, H. influenzae cells were lysed and mixed with 2% hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide; the soluble components were then removed and the P2-containing precipitate was resuspended in CaCl2 solution. Col. 4, lines 12-22. Ethanol (20%) was then added to selectively precipitate some components, leaving P2 in solution (col. 4, 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007